Brand claim · Could be specific, and is not
“Award-winning”, “voted #1” and five-star counts
Who gave the award, what they judged, and whether it was paid for. Reputation is standing where the license and the complication plan should be.
Wording it covers
The claim reader flags phrases like these, wherever they appear in an ad:
- “award-winning”
- “voted best”
- “#1”
- “as seen on”
- “featured in”
- “5,000 five-star reviews”
What would back it up
- Which award, from whom, in what year, judged on what
- Whether the feature or listing was paid for
- The licenses and complication plan the reputation is standing in for
The question to ask
Who gave that award, and for what? And separately: who is licensed here, and what is your complication plan?
Can it be checked?
Could be specific, and is not. It could be said specifically, and isn’t. Ask for the specific version.
Brand. A name doing the work of a fact. Ask what the name tells you that a plain description wouldn’t.
What the record says
See also
Read an ad of your own
Paste an ad, a post or a DM. It’s read in your browser, and nothing is sent anywhere.